Most vendors demo their tool.
We test your application.
Free.
Qualified organizations that can authorize a scan target within 14 days of first contact receive a complimentary benchmark scan at no charge. T+ handles all configuration and execution.
No demo. No trial license. No proof-of-concept sequence. Your application, our Invicti-powered platform, and a thorough benchmark of your web application security posture before anything else is required of you.
Offer extended at T+ discretion following an initial qualification conversation.
Delivered using the platform preferred by enterprise AppSec operations. Not a lite version or a configured demonstration.
Takes full advantage of Invicti's comprehensive coverage behind your login, navigating authenticated workflows and maintaining session state throughout.
Covers REST, GraphQL, and web service endpoints alongside your application, with the same authenticated depth and proof-based confirmation applied to every finding.
Native Invicti output delivered without modification. What the instrument finds is what the benchmark contains.
You may recognize yourself here
Consistent, comprehensive insight into your web application security posture is a risk management essential at any scale.
For some organizations it is simply uncharted territory. For others it has been the destination of a costly and time-consuming effort that never fully arrived. The benchmark scan is a reliable, trouble-free path to finding out where you stand, without the overhead that has complicated the pursuit for so many.
| The condition | The consequence | Our answer |
|---|---|---|
| Options galore. A new one every day, each backed by AI breakthrough claims. How do I know which to shortlist? | Decisions get deferred, bad choices get made, or both. | Freeware and low-cost tools serve a limited purpose. AI-assisted review addresses static code, not running applications. Invicti carries a longstanding, independently recognized record as the leading commercial DAST platform. A benchmark scan conducted on that platform is the most efficient way to establish a credible reference point. |
| I am getting formal application security testing started. I need the first platform decision to hold up as the organization grows. | A poor initial choice sets the effort back before it gains traction and rarely gets revisited without an incident to force the issue. | T+ delivers the Invicti platform as a managed service or a direct license. Either path gives new AppSec coverage the credibility of a proven commercial instrument from the first benchmark scan, without the cost and delay of an extended internal evaluation. |
| The solution we invested in carries performance and efficiency shortcomings it cannot scale beyond, including alert fatigue, scans that require manual intervention to complete, and coverage gaps that only surface when a finding is challenged. | The investment continues drawing budget and attention while delivering less coverage and confidence than the organization requires. | A complimentary benchmark scan through T+'s Invicti-powered platform produces a direct comparison at no cost and no commitment. What the results show tends to be instructive. The conversation that follows addresses what a transition would require and what it would recover. |
| A compliance requirement, insurance audit, or customer contract has made formal dynamic testing something I can no longer defer. | Output that cannot withstand scrutiny creates a compliance posture that is more liability than protection. | Invicti's proof-based scanning confirms exploitability rather than flagging theoretical risk. That distinction matters when benchmark findings are reviewed by an auditor, an insurer, or a customer security team. T+ delivers and interprets that output under both managed and licensed arrangements. |
| Our developers use AI-assisted code review. I assume that covers most of the application risk surface. | Runtime vulnerabilities in authenticated workflows go undetected because no static tool reaches them. | AI-assisted review and dynamic application security testing address different risk surfaces. The former reads code. The latter interacts with a running application and confirms whether a vulnerability is exploitable under real operating conditions. The benchmark scan makes that distinction visible against your own application. |
| Our scans produce more findings than the team can act on. I need less noise and more of what is actually actionable. | Remediation stalls. Critical issues are buried alongside informational output and the risk backlog compounds with every release cycle. | Invicti's proof-based engine confirms exploitability before surfacing a finding. That single distinction reduces alert volume materially and gives remediation teams something they can act on without a secondary triage layer. T+'s managed service adds prioritization and context on top of that output. |
| AppSec and product delivery are competing for the same engineering hours and AppSec is not winning. | Testing is consistently deferred in favor of shipping and the risk surface widens with every release. | T+'s managed AppSec service removes the dependency on internal engineering capacity entirely. Scanning, configuration, benchmark interpretation, and remediation guidance are delivered as a fully outsourced function. Product delivery and security testing are no longer competing for the same resource. |
| Our scanner can log in. Whether it can complete a full authenticated session without someone watching it is another matter. | Coverage is incomplete, interrupted scans go unnoticed, and the engineering time spent supervising the process is exactly what automation was supposed to eliminate. | Invicti's authentication handling sustains session state across the full duration of a scan without manual intervention. A benchmark that requires supervision to complete is not a benchmark. It is a partial picture. The complimentary scan demonstrates the difference directly. |
How the offer works
A brief initial conversation confirms the offer is appropriate for your organization and application environment.
You identify and authorize a target application within fourteen days. T+ handles all scan configuration and execution.
Native Invicti output delivered without modification. The benchmark report is yours regardless of what follows.
A results conversation covers what was found, what it means for your security posture, and which delivery model fits your organization going forward.
What follows the benchmark
The benchmark conversation identifies which delivery model fits. Neither requires starting over.
Managed AppSec
Outsourced application security, operated end to end
True Positives assumes full operational responsibility for vulnerability detection, expert validation, and remediation guidance. Appropriate for organizations that want continuous coverage without the overhead of building a dedicated internal security function. Recurring benchmark scans are included as part of the managed engagement.
Direct Platform Licensing
Invicti licensed directly, supported by T+ expertise
The Invicti platform licensed for internal operation, with T+ available for onboarding, configuration, and ongoing advisory support. Appropriate for organizations ready to operate the platform in-house, with a proven commercial instrument already validated against their environment through the benchmark scan.
Qualified organizations / 14-day window
If your organization carries web application or API risk and can authorize a target application within fourteen days, we will show you exactly where your security posture stands before any further commitment is required.
Offer extended to qualified organizations at T+ discretion following an initial conversation.
Results delivered as native Invicti output without manual annotation or triage.
